Forum Moderators: Kalypso, JacquelineJ
(Last Updated: 2024 Nov 22 3:40 pm)
odf posted at 9:58 PM Sat, 17 August 2024 - #4488491
Rhia474 posted at 9:16 PM Sat, 17 August 2024 - #4488489Thank you - we're not okay. LOL (granted, I'm not a tailor, but I do some sewing... for cosplay even. We're NOT okay LMAO)I swear, the longer I play with dynamic clothes, the more my respect for tailors grows. And for anyone who can sew, really!Yes, even all the way around, achieved with clever tailoring, just like with longer skirts.
On the hemline for skirts, I can tell you - cheap skirts are often the same length all around, much to my aggravation, as a big butt owner. Yes, they hike up at the back. Yes, it looks bad. Please don't be a cheap digital tailor. 🤣
- - - - - -
Feel free to call me Ohki!
Poser Pro 11, Poser 12 and Poser 13, Windows 10, Superfly junkie. My units are milimeters.
Persephone (the computer): AMD Ryzen 9 5900x, RTX 3070 GPU, 96gb ram.
That one is up for the look you're going for. When I make my digital stuff, I often make curved patterns at the waist. The patterns tend to curve down (like a U) at the front pattern and curve up at the back pattern to fit neatly.Follow-up question: should the waistband also be perfectly horizontal? (Implying that it really has to sit snug in the waist and not sag.)
- - - - - -
Feel free to call me Ohki!
Poser Pro 11, Poser 12 and Poser 13, Windows 10, Superfly junkie. My units are milimeters.
Persephone (the computer): AMD Ryzen 9 5900x, RTX 3070 GPU, 96gb ram.
Well, I'm definitely a very cheap digital tailor, but I'm trying to do better. 😅odf posted at 9:58 PM Sat, 17 August 2024 - #4488491
Rhia474 posted at 9:16 PM Sat, 17 August 2024 - #4488489Thank you - we're not okay. LOL (granted, I'm not a tailor, but I do some sewing... for cosplay even. We're NOT okay LMAO)I swear, the longer I play with dynamic clothes, the more my respect for tailors grows. And for anyone who can sew, really!Yes, even all the way around, achieved with clever tailoring, just like with longer skirts.
On the hemline for skirts, I can tell you - cheap skirts are often the same length all around, much to my aggravation, as a big butt owner. Yes, they hike up at the back. Yes, it looks bad. Please don't be a cheap digital tailor. 🤣
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.
odf posted at 3:15 AM Mon, 19 August 2024 - #4488519Good point! I was only thinking about straight waist bands, but of course I could also make them curved.That one is up for the look you're going for. When I make my digital stuff, I often make curved patterns at the waist. The patterns tend to curve down (like a U) at the front pattern and curve up at the back pattern to fit neatly.Follow-up question: should the waistband also be perfectly horizontal? (Implying that it really has to sit snug in the waist and not sag.)
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.
So far, the skirt looks good. However, she is leaning forward in those poses indicating that the front of the skirt is shorter than the back. Put her in a different, upright pose or place her in a T- or A- stance.
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.
jroulin posted at 11:12 AM Thu, 22 August 2024 - #4488632
Easy, I hem all my garments, but instead of folding the fabric in, I create extra pattern pieces to be sewn under the main fabric. That allows me to assign a separate "hem" material and make them invisible in Poser because a small amount of poke-through is bound to happen.Hi odf they are really looking great!
I just have one question; how do you do your cloth thickness? Are you using the piping in MD2? I was giving up on that as I did never archive good results and do them in Hexagon in a second step.
Here's what the pieces, sewing and internal lines look like for the waistband in the skirt above:
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.
By the way - seeing that, as per usual, things are turning out fiddlier than I originally expected - I've changed my release plan slightly. I think it will be a three by three now, three miniskirts as one FreeStuff item, then three shorts as a second, and finally three textile-efficient tops. All kind of summery and thus perhaps a bit off season for the Northern hemisphere, but then again, I am not on the Northern hemisphere. ;-)
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.
Thanks for the explanation odf having the back layer invisible is a good way not to have pooks visible. I need to think about it.jroulin posted at 11:12 AM Thu, 22 August 2024 - #4488632
Easy, I hem all my garments, but instead of folding the fabric in, I create extra pattern pieces to be sewn under the main fabric. That allows me to assign a separate "hem" material and make them invisible in Poser because a small amount of poke-through is bound to happen.Hi odf they are really looking great!
I just have one question; how do you do your cloth thickness? Are you using the piping in MD2? I was giving up on that as I did never archive good results and do them in Hexagon in a second step.
Here's what the pieces, sewing and internal lines look like for the waistband in the skirt above:
Create the length at mid-thigh. Then you can create a length adjustment morph that goes from mini to knee length without too much texture distortion. 8-)I'm currently debating whether to make the tight/straight/pencil skirt just a tiny bit longer, so that it doesn't ride up quite as much when she sits down. Once I've decided, I think it's on to materials.
DeeceyArt posted at 8:57 AM Mon, 26 August 2024 - #4488791
I imagine I could do that, but for clothes I make with MD, I generally prefer to change the length there and export as a separate item.Create the length at mid-thigh. Then you can create a length adjustment morph that goes from mini to knee length without too much texture distortion. 8-)
I could certainly change all three skirts to mid-thigh length, though, if folks prefer that.
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.
Thanks! Maybe my phrasing was unclear. I understand the suggestion, I just don't want to make the morphs for the length modification. If I made the skirts mid-thigh length, folks could make their own morphs with magnets if they so chose.I think the suggestion was more to create an item that cak be modified in length to be more versatile.
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.
On second thought, I think I should probably just make the straight skirt a teensy bit longer for now as mentioned and publish them like that. I can always make a set of longer skirts later if there's demand.
Generally, please don't hesitate to ask if you'd like a variation of any piece of clothing I've published, especially if it's just something like longer/shorter/tighter/wider sleeves/legs/waist. Chances are it's easy to do, and even if I don't feel like making a new proper FreeStuff item, I can always make it available for download somewhere as a free-floating prop file.
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.
Content Advisory! This message contains nudity
I heard an "oooh" from Ohki, so I dug out the old MD file for the shirt/blouse, cleaned up the pattern and fitted it to La Femme 2. It's always a bit of a pain to "cross-drape" clothes by hand, so I'm glad I did that. Here's a fully buttoned version before hemming (nudity checked just in case because of the hint of areolas visible through the fabric).
A thing I found when I worked on this for Antonia is that Poser is really keen on unbuttoning her, so I had to add an actual seam for every closed button, which also means that every open-close pattern requires a separate prop. I ended up doing fully buttoned, single-button and unbuttoned for the old Antonia version, which I'd probably do again were I to release an LF2 one. But maybe "fully buttoned" could leave the bottom and top (or top two) buttons open? I'm not sure what the current rules are about these things.
Also, obviously the buttons need to be rigid decorations. I forgot about that and Poser *did not* like it. :-)
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.
That's the goal. Well, not necessarily the single-handed part.... Single-handedly giving her a full (and great) wardroooobe~~
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.
Now I'm playing with the simulation settings for the collar to see what looks best. Here I made to top (folded over) part of the collar as stiff as it goes, while leaving everything else at Poser's defaults. That's definitely looking much better than making the bottom part of the collar also really stiff. But I guess a bit more stability might not hurt. Maybe I'll just hem it and see how that works. I think I'll have to hem the folded over part, as well, just to give it some visual thickness. Incidentally, I'm not sure whether to call this a blouse or a shirt. It does have a shirt-like collar but is very fitted and does not have a yoke or a collar button (at least not yet, who knows).
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.
By the way, would anyone be super-keen on an office-compatible version of this combo? I've never been an office lady, so I can only guess at what's appropriate, but I'm thinking skirt knee-long, sleeves down to the elbows, shirt tugged in might work? Simulating a skirt over a tugged-in shirt is pretty much a no-go, so I'd just merge them into one item then.
At least seven material options, naturally.
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.
This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.
Anyway, for the pleated skirt, pulling the waistband up to the waist and adding 4cm of length in the back seems to do the trick.
-- I'm not mad at you, just Westphalian.